October 4, 2004 ITEM
# 5
Item
Title: Public Hearing on
Ordinance Amendment OA 04/05 to Amend the Wake County Subdivision Ordinance to
Change the Manner in Which Cul de Sac Length is Measured
Specific
Action Requested:
That the Board of Commissioners hold a
public hearing and approve the requested ordinance amendment as presented.
Item
Summary:
The Planning Board has received, and
approved, 31 requests for variances from the Subdivision Ordinance’s maximum
allowable cul de sac length (Section 3-4-8 (D) (9) between January 2003 and
April 2004 (16 months). The Planning
Board has not declined any variance requests of this nature because all such
applications were found to comply with the required variance justification
provisions.
Analysis:
Typically, such a large number of
variances from one specific ordinance section (e.g.—cul de sac length)
indicates that the regulation is not a good fit with the development patterns
that are occurring within the community.
Several of the situations where variances have been granted by the
Planning Board were cases where the subdivider was proposing to make only a
relatively minor road extension that, by itself, did not exceed the cul de sac
length limitation. The necessary
variance resulted from their site being at the end of a lengthy existing road
system that had complied with the County’s interconnectivity requirements, but
now cannot be extended any further because they are effectively blocked by
floodplains, wetlands, water quality buffers or other environmental
constraints.
Currently, the Subdivision Ordinance
measures the length of a cul de sac street from the center of the cul de sac
bulb back to the midpoint of the closest intersection with a through
street. For the purposes of this
section, a through street is interpreted as a street that does not end in a
dead end (e.g.—a cul de sac or a T-turnaround). Changing the manner in which the length of a cul de sac is
measured will eliminate many of the variance requests. The proposed ordinance amendment would
measure the length of the cul de sac from the midpoint of the cul de sac bulb
to the midpoint of the closest intersecting street, whether or not that street
is a through street.
Planning Staff Findings:
The proposed amendment is desirable
because it would:
Planning Staff
Recommendation:
That the Board of Commissioners hold a
public hearing and approve the proposed ordinance amendment as presented.
Planning Board Recommendation:
The Planning Board recommended at their August 4, 2004 meeting, by
a vote of 9 to 0, that the Board of Commissioners approve the proposed
ordinance amendment as presented.
Attachments:
(1) Staff Report (Includes Resolution and Ordinance)
(2) Illustrations of the Effect of Current and Proposed Ordinance Provisions
(3) Draft Excerpt of August 4, 2004 Planning Board Minutes